IFN Lab: Scenario Comparison - Add/Reduce Lanes

By Kardi Teknomo, PhD

< Previous | Index | Next >

Brief Description

In this IFN Virtual lab, you will learn how to solve traffic congestion by adding or reducing number of lanes. You hear it right, traffic congestion can also be solved by reducing number of lanes (road narrowing) and not always by adding lanes (road widening). The amount of improvement would actually depends on the nework structure.

Given the capacity matrix \( \mathbf{C}_{0} \) of base scenario, you can modify it into the capacity matrix \( \mathbf{C}_{1} \) of alternative scenario. The modification can be done through of one the following:

• add a link
• delete link
• change link direction
• add a lane
• reduce lane

Reducing the lanes up to zero is equal to delete the link. In this page of IFN Virtual Lab, our focus is only on the policy of add or reduce lanes. Other policies such as adding or deleting links, or changing link direction would be discussed in other IFN labs.

Examples of add lanes would be removal of on-streat parking, or road widening. Examples of reduce lanes would be allowing on street parking, change the vehicular traffic lanes into more bike and pedestrian friendly lanes or garden. Temporary closure of lanes due to on street activities is also teh example of lane reduction.

Congestion matrix \( \mathbf{G} \) is computed by element-wise division between ideal flow matrix and the capacity matrix.

All the traffic performances such as travel time, delay, speed, density are computed based on link flow and congestion level. Thus, checking the maximum congestion level in one way to aggregate these traffic performances into a single index.

Learning Objectives

• To understand how to get the invariant of total flow \( \kappa \) based on maximum congestion
• To compare the alternative scenario with the base scenario on which scenario would produce smaller max congestion
• To find best scenario of the alternative scenario given the policy

Prerequisite

Read: Graph Theory and Linear Algebra

Instruction

1. Generate random irreducible capacity matrix by clicking . You can also modify it manually. The input capacity matrix must be a non-negative square matrix and irreducible. End each row separated by a semicolon. Separate each data in one row by comma or a space.
2. Set the alternative scenario by modifying the base scenario. Select the links, number of lanes and then to add lane modification to buffer, or click to reduce lane modification to buffer.
3. Click the arrow to create or update the Alternative scenario based on the base capacity matrix and modofication buffer.
4. Set base scenario congestion level and click to run the scenario comparison to compare the base scenario with the alternative scenario.
5. Click on Find Scenarios button to generate the list all of the possible alternative scenarios from your base capacity. Click twice on the header of the generated table to sort based on max congestion.

Experiment and Discussion

• Comparison of base and alternative scenarios.
• Generate random Capacity matrix of base scenario. Modify the capacity matrix into an alternative scenario by adding or reducing number of lanes in the existing links. Then, click Compare button to start the computation of scenario comparison.
• Is adding lanes always reduce traffic congestion?
• Is reduce lanes always increase traffic congestion?
• Investigate the characteristics of alternative scenario
• Use Finding Scenarios to list add or reduce the number of lanes up to certain lanes.
• Does changing the base scenario congestion level would change the percent of change in max congestion level for the same scenario?
• What scenario to add or reduce the number of lanes that does not change the max congestion?
• What scenario to reduce the number of lanes and increase the max congestion?
• What scenario to reduce the number of lanes and decrease the max congestion?
• What scenario to add the number of lanes and increase the max congestion?
• What scenario to add the number of lanes and decrease the max congestion?
• Challenge yourself
• Check the report on the matrices of Stochastic, Flow, Congestion to investigate in more detail the pattern of changes.
• Does changing the base scenario congestion level would change the best link and percent of change in max congestion level?
• What pattern of the scenarios that the adding or reduction in the number of lanes that does not change the max congestion? Why does it happen?
• What pattern of the scenarios that the reduction in the number of lanes can actually improve the traffic performance in term of reduction in max congestion?
• What pattern of the scenarios that the adding the number of lanes can actually worsen the traffic performance in term of increase of max congestion?
• What is the role of the invariant total flow? Check the Equivalent IFN lab to find the answer

Lab Tool: Scenario Add/Reduce Lanes

size:

Base Capacity

5, 1, 1, 2; 0, 0, 1, 0; 2, 0, 0, 2; 2, 0, 0, 0;
--Select an operation-- Is Irreducible? Is Premagic? Is Stochastic? Is Ideal Flow?

Pattern of Base Scenario

Scenario Modification
Lane: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Base Congestion: 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.0

Report: (below)
Base Stochastic Matrix
Alternative Stochastic Matrix
Base Flow Matrix
Alternative Flow Matrix
Base Congestion Matrix
Alternative Congestion Matrix

Finding Scenarios: (below)
Add lane scenarios
Reduce lane scenarios
Up to number of lanes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Alternative Capacity


--Select an operation-- Is Irreducible? Is Premagic? Is Stochastic? Is Ideal Flow?

Pattern of Alternative Scenario

Base Capacity Network

IFN Lab: Scenario Comparison - Add/Reduce Lanes

Index