|
|||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
| Cross Tabulation The simplest multi criteria decision making is to put into a cross table of criteria and alternatives. Then we put subjective score value on each cell of the table. The sum (or normalized sum) of and compute the sum of all factors for each alternatives. For example, we have 3 alternative choices X, Y and Z and four criteria to decide the alternatives A, B, C and D. You can input any name for alternatives and criteria. The values on the table 2 are any number certain range for each factor. The only similarity between these numbers is that they have the same interpretation that higher values are preferable than smaller values. Table 2: Evaluation based on scores of each factor
If you have many alternatives, sometimes it is easier to compare the sum value of each choice by normalizing them. Total sums is 150.55 (=19.4+74.75+56.4). The sum of each choice is normalized by division of each sum with the total sums. For instance, choice X is normalized into 19.4/150.55*100%= 12.9%. Clearly choice Y is preferable than choice Z while choice Z is better than X. However, you will notice that the range of value for each factors are not the same. It is quite unfair to sum all the values of multiple criteria and compare the result. Clearly factor B is dominant because the range has higher value. To be fair, we can propose two solutions:
In the next sections, let us try the two solutions one by one. Comments for this tutorial These tutorial is copyrighted. Preferable reference for this tutorial is Teknomo, Kardi. (2006) Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Tutorial . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||